Corrections firstExisting camerasEarlier awarenessFaster responseStructured proofSafety Intelligence Corrections firstExisting camerasEarlier awarenessFaster responseStructured proofSafety Intelligence

General operational and educational information for corrections professionals. Not legal, medical, or compliance advice, and not a certification of compliance with any law or standard. Policies and standards vary by agency and jurisdiction; follow your facility's policy and your own legal, medical, and professional advisors.

// Tools and templates

60-Day Audit Readiness Checklist

An audit is only worth what the facility puts into it. This checklist covers what to gather and verify beforehand so the sixty days measure real practice instead of being spent hunting for documents. Most facilities can complete it in a week.

// Why it matters in corrections

The failure mode for any facility evaluation is spending the first three weeks locating records. By the time the baseline is established, a third of the window is gone and the findings are thinner than they should be.

The second failure mode is evaluating against nothing. If the facility has not written down what its own standard is, the audit can only describe what happens, not whether it met the mark. A facility that states its intended observation intervals in advance gets a far more useful result.

Doing this preparation is also independently valuable. Several facilities have found the preparation more clarifying than the audit, because it is the first time in years anyone assembled the operating picture in one place.

// How to use this checklist

1. Write down your current stated standard: observation intervals for general housing, for special watch statuses, and for segregation. If it is not written anywhere, write it now.

2. Produce current post orders for every post, with the date each was last revised.

3. Complete a camera coverage self-assessment. Know how many cameras you have, which are functional, and which high-consequence areas lack a usable angle.

4. Confirm recording retention: how many days, on what system, and who can pull footage. Test it by actually retrieving a clip from thirty days ago.

5. Define your zones. Name the four to eight areas where the consequence of a missed event is highest.

6. Gather observation logs for the last ninety days.

7. Gather incident reports for the last twelve months, categorized. Include near misses if you record them, and note it if you do not.

8. Document actual staffing by shift for the last ninety days, including overtime and post consolidations.

9. Identify your baseline metrics. At minimum: average time from event to staff awareness, and the count of events where the facility could not establish a start time.

10. Name an internal owner. One person accountable for the audit inside the facility, with authority to pull records.

11. Brief the shifts. An evaluation that arrives unannounced produces defensiveness and worse data. Tell staff what is being measured and that it is the practice being examined, not the individual.

12. Confirm with your county attorney how observation records will be retained and handled before the window opens, not after.

// Documentation and proof

The single most valuable item on this list is item one. A facility that has written its own standard can be measured against it. A facility that has not can only be described.

Keep the readiness package. It becomes the baseline the audit is measured from and the reference point for every subsequent review.

Be honest in item seven. An audit built on an incident record that quietly omits the difficult months produces findings the facility cannot act on.

// Where Safety Intelligence fits

The 60-Day Safety Intelligence Audit measures a facility's coverage, observation practice, and documentation against the standard the facility itself has stated, and produces a written finding rather than a demonstration.

During the window, Virtual Patrol applies real-time attention to the facility's designated zones using existing cameras, with a person reviewing every observation and facility staff making every decision. The output is a written report the facility owns.

// Frequently asked

What is a 60-Day Safety Intelligence Audit?

A defined evaluation period in which a facility's camera coverage, observation practice, and documentation are measured against the facility's own stated standard, producing a written finding.

Why does the facility need to state its own standard first?

Because without it the audit can describe what happens but cannot say whether it met the mark. A stated interval for each housing status turns description into measurement.

How long does readiness preparation take?

About a week for most county facilities. The longest items are usually assembling ninety days of observation logs and testing footage retrieval.

What baseline metrics matter most?

Average time from event to staff awareness, and the count of events where the facility could not establish when the event began. Those two describe the gap the audit is trying to close.

Should staff be told an audit is happening?

Yes. Unannounced evaluation produces defensiveness and worse data. Be explicit that the practice is being measured rather than individuals.

What if the facility has no written post orders or standards?

Write them before the window opens. Facilities frequently report that this step alone was worth more than they expected, because it is the first time the operating picture has been assembled in one place.

What should be settled with the county attorney beforehand?

Retention and handling of observation records, alignment with existing jail video retention policy, and litigation hold procedures. Settle it before the window rather than after the first request.

Request a Safety Intelligence Audit   Back to the Library
// Related
The 60-Day Safety Intelligence Audit → Jail Camera Coverage Self-Assessment → Safety Intelligence Zones → How to read a Safety Intelligence Score →